Les dernieres nouvelles sur la blockchain, la propriete intellectuelle et l'horodatage numerique : evolutions juridiques, tendances et analyses
9 articles in this category
Browse our selection of Actualites articles. Content written by our experts to help you protect your creations and understand blockchain timestamping.
In its draft guidelines on web scraping for generative AI, the EDPB recommends recording the timestamp of collected data before using it. A look at a text open for consultation until 30 October 2026.
On 8 July 2026, the European Data Protection Board adopted the final version of its guidelines on blockchain and the GDPR. Here is what they recommend and what it means for timestamping and digital proof.
The eIDAS 2.0 regulation introduces a new qualified trust service: Qualified Electronic Ledgers (QEL). What they are, who needs them, and why most proof-of-priority use cases will not require one.
The Paris Court of Appeal upheld an electronically signed contract once a complete contractual file was produced. What it means for evidence files, both for signatures and timestamps.
Published on 7 April 2026, Implementing Regulation 2026/798 sets the technical standards for remote onboarding of European Digital Identity Wallets. A clear-eyed read for DPOs, CISOs and corporate counsel.
On 8 April 2026, the French Senate adopted in first reading a bill creating a presumption of use of a protected work by an AI provider whenever a bundle of indicators makes that use plausible. Decoding the text, the reversal of the burden of proof, and what it means for creators who want to gather these indicators in advance.
On 14 April 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union clarified the scope of the pastiche exception in the Pelham II case. Practical consequences for proving the chronology of your derivative creations.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/2164 updates the format of European Trusted Lists effective 29 April 2026. Decoding this technical refresh, what it prepares for eIDAS 2.0, and what it means concretely when you need to verify the qualified status of a timestamp or trust service provider.
A French court has accepted blockchain anchoring as admissible evidence in a copyright dispute. Here is what the ruling means, how EU regulations are catching up, and what creators should do now.